MG ZS opinions and user reviews on its size
Genuine driver comments on their experience with the MG ZS and their ratings of various size aspects.
Opinions on the MG ZS 2022-2025 size based on the experience:
Average of 28 ratings
Satisfaction with size:
4.8/5Performance in city:
4.6/5Front seats space:
4.9/5Rear seats space:
4.5/5Use of boot space:
4.6/5Average weekly mileage: 390 km
Ayr, 12-04-2025 (3.4★/5)
Over all good basic car - let down with software/firmware faults on the onboard system
Over all good basic car - let down with software/firmware faults on the onboard system
Opinions on the MG ZS EV 2020-2021 size based on the experience:
Average of 13 ratings
Satisfaction with size:
4.2/5Performance in city:
4.2/5Front seats space:
4.7/5Rear seats space:
4.4/5Use of boot space:
4.5/5Average weekly mileage: 310 km
Manchester, 28-01-2025 (5★/5)
Easy to drive and highly responsive. Very comfortable driving position. Plenty of interior room.
Easy to drive and highly responsive. Very comfortable driving position. Plenty of interior room.
Norwich , 22-01-2024 (3.8★/5)
The car is too wide to park in marked spaces so the city is not great. Otherwise a nice size.
The car is too wide to park in marked spaces so the city is not great. Otherwise a nice size.
Auckland, 15-10-2021 (3.4★/5)
This car is a great price but too big in the bonnet and for the electric version totally not needed - like driving a whale
This car is a great price but too big in the bonnet and for the electric version totally not needed - like driving a whale
